Starting a few years earlier can be worth far more than the extra contributions.
A when-to-start calculator shows the cost of delaying retirement savings, comparing someone who begins now with someone who waits a few years, using the same contribution.
Because early contributions compound the longest, waiting to start is surprisingly costly. The dollars you invest in your twenties and thirties do far more work than the same dollars added later. Delaying even a few years can cost tens of thousands by retirement, more than the contributions you skipped.
The lesson isn't to wait until you can afford the 'right' amount, it's to start now with whatever you can and raise it over time. Capturing an employer match first is the highest-return move. Time in the market is the biggest advantage a young saver has, and it can't be recovered later.
Early contributions compound the longest, so they grow far more than the same amount added later. Waiting a few years can cost far more than the skipped contributions.
Start anyway. Small early contributions capture years of compounding, and you can increase them as your income grows.
No. Later starts have fewer years to compound, but catch-up contributions and a higher savings rate still make a meaningful difference.
See the exact formula and a worked example on our methodology page.